Should we fix the date of Easter?

I don't really know Nick Holtam, Bishop of Salisbury (he was appointed later on I left the diocese), but he appears to have a deep capacity for irony. Manifestly he believes that fixing the date of Easter is going to exist more complicated than agreeing on the status of same-sex unions:

If the Primates of the Anglican Communion thought same-sexual practice relationships are hard to know what to exercise with, just wait until they get going on the implications of fixing the date of Easter.

Here are the 'compelling' arguments for not fixing the engagement of Easter.

ane. The current system connects us with the Jewish celebration of Passover

Except it doesn't. Last year they came close, but this year Passover (on 14 Nisan in the Jewish calendar) comes a month later than Easter. Here are the dates since the plow of the Millennium:

Year	Passover	Easter	Days
2000	April 18	April 23	v
2001	April 6	April xv	9
2002	March 26	March 31	5
2003	April xv	April twenty	5
2004	Apr 4	April 11	seven
2005	Apr 22	March 27	-26
2006	April 11	April 16	v
2007	Apr 1	Apr viii	7
2008	April 18	March 23	-26
2009	April vii	Apr 12	v
2010	March 28	April iv	6
2011	April 17	Apr 24	7
2012	Apr 5	April 8	3
2013	March 24	March 31	7
2014	April 13	Apr 20	7
2015	April ii	April 5	3
2016	Apr 21	March 27	-25
2017	April 9	April 16	seven
2018	March 29	April ane	three
2019	April 18	April 21	3
2020	Apr 7	April 12	five
2021	March 26	April 4	9

Since the offset Easter followed Passover past 3 days, you can see that the electric current connection is non very shut very frequently—and on three occasions the engagement drifts out by about a month.

2. It is about the Jewish roots of Easter

It is rather important that we recognise the connexion betwixt the Jewish festival and Jesus' death and resurrection. But when was the last time y'all heard or preached a sermon which made that connectionon the footing of the date of Easter, rather than by reflection on the biblical texts?

3. Information technology is about historical reference

If this is so of import, how practise we manage to celebrate Christmas at a time which certainly does not correspond to the fourth dimension of yr of the original—and in fact noting clear prove of this contradiction?

4. It is a question of Christian unity

Actually, there has been a desire to ready the appointment of Easter for some fourth dimension, across a number of major denominations. Justin Welby comments that the first endeavor was about 1,000 years agone! In that location has been interest in the Roman Catholic church since the Second Vatican Council in 1963. And it looks every bit though this initiative has back up from denominations other than the C of E: Pope Francis asked the Eastern Churches if Christians could concord a engagement for Easter, and the Copts suggested a fixed date.

5. It is an accommodation to contemporary culture

Holtam comments:

It seems to me a curiously unexamined slice of cultural adaptation that would divide the timing of Easter from Passover and detach us from our Jewish roots.

That would exist true—if at that place really was such a close connection, if the date facilitated that connection, and if there was whatsoever existent theological importance attached to the date of Easter, which there doesn't appear to exist.

---

So how have nosotros ended upwardly being only semi-detached from Passover, and why is the discussion so complex? It comes downwards to the fact that we accept three ways of counting time, from ane year to some other, and we have fabricated some compromises about this.

• The Jewish agenda is based on the lunar cycle, and every bit a consequence has to add an actress month half dozen times in every 19 years.
• Western calendars are based on the solar cycle of 365 days; the adjustment needed is much smaller, and effected by calculation i extra day on most of every quaternary year.
• The item of our lives is regulated by the weekly cycle of seven days, which matches neither the lunar nor the solar cycle.

In deciding when to celebrate Easter, we demand to decide on whether to match our celebration with the identify of the original upshot in the lunar, the solar or the weekly cycle. Equally Ray Fowler helpfully explains, the Council of Nicea decided to combine weekly and lunar cycles in the calculation, though framed inside a solar wheel reference betoken.

The early on church building was faced with the post-obit disharmonize in dates: Jesus rose on a Sunday, only Passover tin can fall on various days of the week. So the early church saw two options:

1. Celebrate Easter in strict relation to the 14th of Nisan without regard for the twenty-four hour period of the week, or
2. Decide a system whereby Easter could always exist celebrated on a Lord's day.

Although the issue was hotly debated and variously proficient during the first centuries of the church, the Council of Nicea in 325 A.D. eventually adopted the current system of celebrating Easter on the Sun following the full moon after the vernal equinox.

The reason for keeping Easter on a Sunday (unlike Christmas) has to do with the theological significance of the resurrection: it is the sign of the breaking in of the kingdom of God, the Historic period to Come, which inside some rabbinical thinking was the eighth age post-obit the seven ages of this earth. Sunday is the eighth day of the week, following the 7 days from the previous Sunday to Sat, and thus has immense theological significance—plenty to atomic number 82 this early Jewish motion to alter its celebration of Sabbath, from rest in the first creation to resting in the new creation. When we worship together on a Sunday, we are symbolically stepping into this new Age, the new creation that we are anticipating.

(Measuring the lunar result of new moon from the vernal equinox introduces the framework of the solar bicycle, and is what detaches the calculation from the Jewish lunar agenda.)

All this explains the varied distance between Passover and Easter, and in particular the occasional oddities.

Every then often the Jewish leap year will push Passover so far into April that asecond full moon following the vernal equinox would appear earlier the Sunday following Passover. This happens anytime the Sunday following Passover falls later than Apr 25th on our calendar. On those rare occasions Easter is historic the month earlier Passover rather than the Sunday post-obit Passover.

---

This so highlights our own cultural context. I don't know about you, simply I tend to gloat my birthday on theanniversary date, rather than on the aforementioned day of the week I was born, or at the aforementioned time in the lunar cycle. The churches are also divided between those who employ the Gregorian calendar and those who however apply the Julian agenda, and and then celebrate Easter (and Christmas) at a different time—for Easter, normally around 13 days later.

If nosotros don't fix the appointment of Easter, and so we will lose the focus on Easter in the (annotation the name) Easter holidays. Information technology has become clear this year that schools are going to prioritise having even terms and meliorate instruction timetables over adherence to what looks to nigh people like a very obscure way of determining a date for the festival—and practically it is a flake of a nightmare. If we want Easter to remain a focus, rather than be marginalised in culture, fixing the date would achieve that. Seeing this equally 'unexamined cultural adaptation' supposes that living in line with the lunar bike is distinctively Christian or theological important, and I think it is neither.

And since we can work out the actual date of Easter with some conviction, the most logical affair to do might exist to fix information technology near to the anniversary of that engagement.

In the meantime, I wonder if the Bishop of Salisbury might now address the simpler question, and stick with celebrated, orthodox pedagogy on sexuality…

---

Follow me on Twitter @psephizo

---

Much of my work is done on a freelance ground. If yous have valued this post, would you lot consideraltruistic £1.twenty a month to support the production of this blog?

If you enjoyed this, practice share it on social media (Facebook or Twitter) using the buttons on the left. Follow me on Twitter @psephizo. Similar my folio on Facebook.

Much of my piece of work is done on a freelance basis. If you take valued this post, you can make a single or repeat donation through PayPal:

Comments policy: Practiced comments that engage with the content of the mail, and share in respectful debate, can add real value. Seek get-go to sympathise, then to be understood. Brand the most charitable construal of the views of others and seek to learn from their perspectives. Don't view contend every bit a disharmonize to win; address the statement rather than tackling the person.

durhamallons1966.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.psephizo.com/life-ministry/should-we-fix-the-date-of-easter/